Johnny Depp,pentru fani

[Pauline Kael]

De pe net adunat:


Johnny Depp-Cãlãreþul fãrã cep(prelucrare versificata a unui banc)-

Text postat de FLORIN RADULESCU
Un pirat din Caraibe, aducând cu Johnny Depp
Când juca în filmu' ãla, "Cãlãreþul fãrã cep",
Intrã într-un bar de noapte, fluierând ca pitpalacu',
-Nu te-am mai vãzut pe-aicea de mult timp ºi-arãþi ca dracu’!
Ce s-a întâmplat, amigo? barmanul întreabã franc
Scãrpinându-ºi cu emfazã bãtãtura prin bocanc,
-Nu-nþeleg ce spui, pe bune, replicã piratul demn,
-Pãi, nu-i clar?Mai înainte nu aveai picior de lemn!
-Ooo...În lupte seculare m-a lovit brusc o ghiulea,
-Dar cârligul de la mânã?-Altã luptã de belea,
Când m-au capturat duºmanii ºi m-au dus la cãpitan,
Mi-a fãcut "chiftele" mâna, nesimþitul, c-un ciocan!
Pânã sã invoc toþi zeii sau pe maicã-mea s-o strig,
M-am si procopsit, mãi frate, peste noapte c-un carlig.
-Înþeleg, dar ce e ãsta, peticul ce-l porþi pe ochi?
Barmanul uimit îºi scuipã fix în sân, ca la deochi,
-ªtii, o pasãre nãroadã, din vãzduh s-a uºurat
Drept in ochiul meu, rãspunde zgubiliticul pirat.
-Tu susþii cã "periscopul" l-ai pierdut întâmplãtor
Fi'ndcã biata zburãtoare te-a "blagoslovit" din nor?!
-Nu chiar, dragul meu novice...Era prima zi în care
Eu mi-am scãrpinat sprânceana cu cârligul din dotare!



Bancul de la care s-a pornit

"Un pirat intrã într-un bar...
- Nu te-am vãzut pe aici de ceva vreme, îi spune barmanul. Ce s-a întâmplat cu tine? Arãþi ca dracu'.
- Ce vrei sã spui? întreaba piratul.
- Pãi, înainte nu aveai picior de lemn...
- Ooo...eram într-o luptã ºi m-a lovit o ghiulea.
- Ei, dar ce e cu cârligul de la mânã ?
- Altã luptã. M-au capturat ºi cãpitanul inamic mi-a tãiat mâna. Aºa am cãpãtat cârligul.
- Înþeleg...dar ce e cu peticul de pe ochi? întreabã barmanul.
- O pasãre s-a uºurat drept în ochiul meu, rãspunde piratul.
- Glumeºti...ai pierdut ochiul din cauza unui rahat de pasãre?
- Nu chiar...era prima zi când purtam cârligul la mânã..."

[Amidome_1one]

imi place Johnny Depp pentru ca stie sa isi creeze o alta personalitate, in fiecare film al sau..e original , carismatic si sunt fana a lui inca de cand eram mica si ma uitam la Nightmare on Elm street...singurul film (serial), pe care nu l-am vazut cu el, este 21 jump street...in rest , tot ce e d vazut cu Johnny, e bun vazut....e deosebit de alti actori, e special si e un profesionist in ceea ce face 8)

[buticut]

Vor da la tele cateva filme cu Johnny Depp.

Neaparat sa vedeti:
The Libertine - TVR CULTURAL: Duminica (5 Aprilie) 23:20

Don Juan DeMarco - PROCINEMA: Duminica (12 Aprilie) 20:30

Primul sau rol principal....si nu,nu el canta,Johnny doar fredoneaza putin in masina :
Cry Baby - TVR 2: Sambata (4 Aprilie) 23:10

[Pauline Kael]

Un Quiz:
http://cinema.acasa.ro/quiz/cat-de-m...e-johnny-depp-

[Pauline Kael]

My dear Buticut,

Am vazut Libertinul,in reluare,si I'm bloody sure ca a fost mana ta la mijloc: cum l-am ratat din prima si din a doua,azi-noapte cainele meu s-a apucat sa latre fara motiv fix la ora trei ca sa deschid eu teveul pe Cultural sa-l vad in reluarea reluarilor.
Trebuie sa remarc gustul tau pt senzitiv(daca e vb de Johnny) si nimic nu mai conteaza ,si inca pt o concupiscentza senzoriala pe care n-o banuiam la dumneata.
Filmul a fost aglomerat pana la ingramadire,preferam

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0796335/
sau
http://www.linternaute.com/cinema/fi...insolent.shtml
sau
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0126310/
astfel incat iti recomand plimbari lungi si romantice cu tineri promitatori precum si cetitul cartilor cel fara de zabava.
Love,
Lady Rochester,Countess of Hell and tristesse,durera.

[Pauline Kael]

Trivia:
A scene was deleted that included a kiss between Johnny Depp and Rupert Friend.
Au scos creme de la creme
Imi pare rau ca am ratat "Don Juan de Marco",cu idolul lui,Marlon Brando,(dedicat Libertinul).

[buticut]

Trivia:
A scene was deleted that included a kiss between Johnny Depp and Rupert Friend.
Au scos creme de la creme
Imi pare rau ca am ratat "Don Juan de Marco",cu idolul lui,Marlon Brando,(dedicat Libertinul).

Don Juan DeMarco - PROCINEMA: Duminica (12 Aprilie) 20:30
12 aprilie .

L-ai prins de la inceput cu tot cu prologul? Ce diametral opusa este atitudinea sa de la inceput,fata de cea de la sfarsit. Ne avertizeaza cu aroganta ca nu il vom placea si sfarseste prin a-si dori sa fie placut, pe un ton umil. Intr-o Londra in plina modernizare, in care desfraurile se mascau,desi toata lumea stia de ele, vine acest libertin care nu se sfia sa faca ce facea si restul,insa cu exceptia ca el ducea totul la extrem...pentru ca nu ii pasa. Dupa cum spune si el,ceea ce se intampla in mintea lui era mai interesant decat ceea ce se intampla in afara ei. Descopera sensul vietii prea tarziu,cand aceasta deja trecuse pe langa el fara ca sa profite de ea si se impaca cu Dumnezeu intr-o ultima, dar si prima incercare de a-si salva sufletul,prin discursul de la Parlament. Filmul te misca...Libertinul lui Johnny nu te poate lasa indiferent - desi pe tot parcursul filmului face tot posibilul pentru a nu fi placut, ajungi sa simti empatie fata de el,precum toti ceilalti din film - neputiinta sa din secventa cu "nature calling" e edificatoare in acest sens. Wasted talents always make me sad - pentru ca Wilmot era un geniu nonconformist,care insa "arata" prea multe.

Depp isi arata toate fatetele, se pierde in spatele perucii si machiajului si ca de obicei,nu interpreteaza,ci creeaza.

Apropo de adevaratul John Wilmot, sa cititi "A Satire Against Mankind"

Were I (who to my cost already am
One of those strange, prodigious creatures, man)
A spirit free to choose, for my own share,
What case of flesh and blood I pleased to wear,
I'd be a dog, a monkey, or a bear,
Or anything but that vain animal
Who is so proud of being rational.


The senses are too gross, and he'll contrive
A sixth, to contradict the other five,
And before certain instinct, will prefer
Reason, which fifty times for one does err;
Reason, an ignis fatuus in the mind,
Which, leaving light of nature, sense, behind,
Pathless and dangerous wandering ways it takes
Through error's fenny bogs and thorny brakes;
Whilst the misguided follower climbs with pain
Mountains of whimseys, heaped in his own brain;
Stumbling from thought to thought, falls headlong down
Into doubt's boundless sea, where, like to drown,
Books bear him up a while, and make him try
To swim with bladders of philosophy;
In hopes still to o'ertake th' escaping light,-
The vapor dances in his dazzling sight
Till, spent, it leaves him to eternal night.
Then old age and experience, hand in hand,
Lead him to death, and make him understand,
After a search so painful and so long,
That all his life he has been in the wrong.
Huddled in dirt the reasoning engine lies,
Who was so proud, so witty, and so wise.


Pride drew him in, as cheats their bubbles catch,
And made him venture to be made a wretch.
His wisdom did his happiness destroy,
Aiming to know that world he should enjoy.
And wit was his vain, frivolous pretence
Of pleasing others at his own expense,
For wits are treated just like common whores:
First they're enjoyed, and then kicked out of doors.
The pleasure past, a threatening doubt remains
That frights th' enjoyer with succeeding pains.
Women and men of wit are dangerous tools,
And ever fatal to admiring fools:
Pleasure allures, and when the fops escape,
'Tis not that they're belov'd, but fortunate,
And therefore what they fear at heart, they hate.


But now, methinks, some formal band and beard
Takes me to task. Come on, sir; I'm prepared.


'Then, by your favour, anything that's writ
Against this gibing, jingling knack called wit
Likes me abundantly; but you take care
Upon this point, not to be too severe.
Perhaps my muse were fitter for this part,
For I profess I can be very smart
On wit, which I abhor with all my heart.
I long to lash it in some sharp essay,
But your grand indiscretion bids me stay
And turns my tide of ink another way.


"What rage ferments in your degenerate mind
To make you rail at reason and mankind?
Blest, glorious man! to whom alone kind heaven
An everlasting soul has freely given,
Whom his great Maker took such care to make
That from himself he did the image take
And this fair frame in shining reason dressed
To dignify his nature above beast;
Reason, by whose aspiring influence
We take a flight beyond material sense,
Dive into mysteries, then soaring pierce
The flaming limits of the universe,
Search heaven and hell, find out what's acted there,
And give the world true grounds of hope and fear."


Hold, mighty man, I cry, all this we know
From the pathetic pen of Ingelo,
From Patrick's Pilgrim, Sibbes's soliloquies,
And 'tis this very reason I despise:
This supernatural gift, that makes a mite
Think he's the image of the infinite,
Comparing his short life, void of all rest,
To the eternal and the ever blest;
This busy, puzzling stirrer-up of doubt
That frames deep mysteries, then finds them out,
Filling with frantic crowds of thinking fools
Those reverend bedlams, colleges and schools;
Borne on whose wings, each heavy sot can pierce
The limits of the boundless universe;
So charming ointments make an old witch fly
And bear a crippled carcass through the sky.
'Tis this exalted power, whose business lies
In nonsense and impossibilities,
This made a whimsical Philosopher
Before the spacious world, his tub prefer,
And we have modern cloistered coxcombs who
Retire to think, 'cause they have nought to do.


But thoughts are given for action's government;
Where action ceases, thought's impertinent.
Our sphere of action is life's happiness,
And he who thinks beyond, thinks like an ass.
Thus, whilst against false reasoning I inveigh,
I own right reason, which I would obey:
That reason which distinguishes by sense
And gives us rules of good and ill from thence,
That bounds desires with a reforming will
To keep them more in vigour, not to kill.
Your reason hinders, mine helps to enjoy,
Renewing appetites yours would destroy.
My reason is my friend, yours is a cheat;
Hunger calls out, my reason bids me eat;
Perversely, yours your appetite does mock:
This asks for food, that answers, "What's o'clock?"
This plain distinction, sir, your doubt secures:
'Tis not true reason I despise, but yours.


Thus I think reason righted, but for man,
I'll ne'er recant; defend him if you can.
For all his pride and his-philosophy,
'Tis evident beasts are, in their degree,
As wise at least, and better far than he.
Those creatures are the wisest who attain,
By surest means, the ends at which they aim.
If therefore Jowler finds and kills his hares
Better than Meres supplies committee chairs,
Though one's a statesman, th' other but a hound,
Jowler, in justice, would be wiser found.


You see how far man's wisdom here extends;
Look next if human nature makes amends:
Whose principles most generous are, and just,
And to whose morals you would sooner trust.
Be judge yourself, I'll bring it to the test:
Which is the basest creature, man or beast?
Birds feed on birds, beasts on each other prey,
But savage man alone does man betray.
Pressed by necessity, they kill for food;
Man undoes man to do himself no good.
With teeth and claws by nature armed, they hunt
Nature's allowance, to supply their want
But man, with smiles, embraces, friendship, praise,
Inhumanly his fellow's life betrays;
With voluntary pains works his distress,
Not through necessity, but wantonness.


For hunger or for love they fight and tear,
Whilst wretched man is still in arms for fear.
For fear he arms, and is of arms afraid,
By fear to fear successively betrayed;
Base fear, the source whence his best passions came:
His boasted honour, and his dear-bought fame;
That lust of power, to which he's such a slave,
And for the which alone he dares be brave;
To which his various projects are designed;
Which makes him generous, affable, and kind;
For which he takes such pains to be thought wise,
And screws his actions in a forced disguise,
Leading a tedious life in misery
Under laborious, mean hypocrisy.
Look to the bottom of his vast design,
Wherein man's wisdom, power, and glory join:
The good he acts, the ill he does endure,
'Tis all from fear, to make himself secure.
Merely for safety, after fame we thirst,
For all men would be cowards if they durst.


And honesty's against all common sense:
Men must be knaves, 'tis in their own defense.
Mankind's dishonest; if you think it fair
Amongst known cheats to play upon the square,
You'll be undone.
Nor can weak truth your reputation save:
The knaves will all agree to call you knave.
Wronged shall he live, insulted o'er, oppressed,
Who dares be less a villain than the rest.
Thus, sir, you see what human nature craves:
Most men are cowards, all men should be knaves.
The difference lies, as far as I can see,
Not in the thing itself, but the degree,
And all the subject matter of debate
Is only: Who's a knave of the first rate?


All this with indignation have I hurled
At the pretending part of the proud world,
Who, swollen with selfish vanity, devise
False freedoms, holy cheats, and formal lies
Over their fellow slaves to tyrannize.


But if in Court so just a man there be
(In Court a just man, yet unknown to me)
Who does his needful flattery direct,
Not to oppress and ruin, but protect
(Since flattery, which way soever laid,
Is still a tax on that unhappy trade);
If so upright a statesman you can find,
Whose passions bend to his unbiased mind,
Who does his arts and policies apply
To raise his country, not his family,
Nor, while his pride owned avarice withstands,
Receives close bribes through friends' corrupted hands


Is there a churchman who on God relies;
Whose life, his faith and doctrine justifies?
Not one blown up with vain prelatic pride,
Who, for reproof of sins, does man deride;
Whose envious heart makes preaching a pretence,
With his obstreperous, saucy eloquence,
To chide at kings, and rail at men of sense;
None of that sensual tribe whose talents lie
In avarice, pride, sloth, and gluttony;
Who hunt good livings, but abhor good lives;
Whose lust exalted to that height arrives
They act adultery with their own wives,
And ere a score of years completed be,
Can from the lofty pulpit proudly see
Half a large parish their own progeny;
Nor doting bishop who would be adored
For domineering at the council board,
A greater fop in business at fourscore,
Fonder of serious toys, affected more,
Than the gay, glittering fool at twenty proves
With all his noise, his tawdry clothes, and loves;


But a meek, humble man of honest sense,
Who, preaching peace, does practice continence;
Whose pious life's a proof he does believe
Mysterious truths, which no man can conceive.
If upon earth there dwell such God-like men,
I'll here recant my paradox to them,
Adore those shrines of virtue, homage pay,
And, with the rabble world, their laws obey.

If such there are, yet grant me this at least:
Man differs more from man, than man from beast.


Ca tot ai pomenit de Moliere (scuze,n-am acccentul bagat la tastatura ) ,ambii criticau dur societatea in operele lor,insa Moliere,apreciat de Ludovic XIV si tinut la curtea sa, in ciuda faptului ca diseca toate categoriile sociale, nu a indraznit sa scrie vreodata o satira care sa aiba in vizor regele, cum a facut John Wilmot. In schimb, burghezii,clericii si chiar si femeile - nu au scapat.

[Pauline Kael]

Buticut lipseste cam o saptamana, mi-a zis, tocmai cand voiam s-o dau disparuta.
In seara asta e filmu' cu Depp si Brando la 8 juma' pe ProCinema(eu credeam ca a fost,hihi )
Asa ca ne mai vedem p-aci.

[Pauline Kael]

Deci m-a plictisit Don Juan de n-am mai putut ,deci.
Comedy light,tras de par,cu Marlon Brando oxigenat cu lentile de contact,cu Faye inca bine,pacat de operatiile alea estetice...
A ,si Johnny joaca un afemeiat de 21 de ani,desi el avea cu vreo 10 ani mai multi in realitate,frumusel ca un semizeu.Pacat de talentul lui .L-a irosit in filme de toata jena.

[buticut]

^Hai sa zicem ca nu l-a irosit,ci ca a salvat filmul de unul singur,cum s-a intamplat si cu Once Upon a Time in Mexico .Pacat ca Brando spre sfarsitul carierei nu a mai facut nimic memorabil.De altfel mi-ar fi placut si ca Chaplin sa se fi oprit la Limelight. Oricum asta nu ii face mai putin geniali . Revenind la Depp,pentru ca se apropie lansarea filmului "Public Enemies"...
I'm all hyped up!!

In cazul in care nu sunteti la curent cu clipurile,va las aici niste linkuri .

Public Enemies - HBO First Look,Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eR9aLV3NnWk

Public Enemies - HBO First Look, Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDVqjYu3s2g

Public Enemies - 8 Clips released by Universal:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHwjYZnkYlk

8 TV Spots, Featurettes and Trailers:
http://www.themoviebox.net/movies/20...es/trailer.php

Featurette aratat in cadrul premiilor MTV Movie Awards:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nReW3gNw5s4

Press Junket Interviews

Johnny
http://www.traileraddict.com/trailer...ew-johnny-depp

Christian

http://www.traileraddict.com/trailer...christian-bale

Marion


http://www.traileraddict.com/trailer...rion-cotillard

Marion @ Late Late Show With Craig Ferguson (HILARIOUS! Oricum stiam ca Marion e o scumpete,dar dupa interviul asta sunt si mai convinsa. She is really FOCUSING hard on what she's doing )
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zazzvv9f86w

Screencaps,Stills,Character Profiles,Wallpapers:
http://johnny-depp.org/galleries/moviepics/

Official Website:
www.publicenemies.net

Official Game:
www.bankraids.com

Am asteptari mari de la film. Deja Christian si Johnny in special sunt "praised",atat de fani si critici,cat si de rudele lui Purvis si Dillinger. I smell Oscar noms. ,poate nu si pt Bale,rolul sau nefiind foarte extins,dar cel putin pentru Depp,desi competitia va fi dura: Leo DiCaprio (Trailerul pt Shutter Island arata grozav), Daniel Day-Lewis, Viggo Mortensen, Morgan Freeman, Sam Rockwell, James McAvoy...toti par strong contenders. Culmea ca toate filmele pe care le astept cu nerabdare au cele mai grozave trailere .

Nu imi pasa catusi de putin de Omul-Auriu-Chel-si-Gol-Tinand-in-Mana-o-Sabie, dar vreau sa il vad pe Johnny pe covorul rosu,lipit de Vanessa si vreau sa il vad...DAND DISCURSUL. The gum-chewing-head-scratching-ear-touching-mumbling-SPEECH! A scapat cu Globul de Aur,cred ca s-a simtit cel mai fericit om de pe pamant,netrebuind sa ofere un discurs,dar nu mai vreau sa se repete istoria .

Toata lumea stie ca merita premiul de multi multi ani,deja ma mir daca il va primi vreodata inainte de cel Lifetime Achievement.Academia i-a ignorat cea mai buna "transformare", John Wilmot,deci nimic nu ma mai surprinde. S-ar putea chiar sa ia Oscarul pentru un rol nu foarte solicitant,doar pentru ca "se simt" ca e timpul. Oricum mai e cale lunga pana atunci si cele mai bune filme apar spre sfarsitul anului.

Si de John Dillinger se spune ca nu e chiar o provocare pt el,dar pare atat de natural,bad-ass si charismatic in rol,ca el insusi probabil creeaza aceasta falsa impresie cum ca ar fi un rol usor. Simt ca in my book John Dillinger nu ii va intrece pe John Wilmot,Sweeney Todd si cei doi Ed's, dar tot va fi un rol memorabil .

Oricum,hoping for the best !

EDIT: Tocmai am vazut ca Academia va avea 10 filme in categoria Best Picture. "Public Enemies" - clar va fi nominalizat

[just4johnny]

imi pare bine sa vad ca si alti romani il apreciaza pe Johnny ...si abia astept sa vad daca johnny va fi nominalizat la oscar pentru PE...eu zic ca merita..

daca sunteti curiosi sa vedeti niste poze de pe platourile de pe filmare...contactati-ma..