Eu as zice ca nu jigneste pe cei care posteaza aici, ba chiar dimpotriva, daca citim de exemplu parerea lui Liviu: http://www.cinemagia.ro/forum/showth...#p ost1524315.

Daca ne uitam la nota de 7.9 pe imbd si la comentarii descoperim ca nu jigneste defel nici pe altii.

Si daca, stiind ca iti plac criticii de renume, ne uitam la ce spun domnii de la Sight & Sound iata ce gasim: "Among the great strengths of this remarkable film is the way such weighty issues are dramatised through the machinations of the story. Its seriousness, and indeed its utter sincerity, lurk behind layers of seemingly superficial naughtiness (...) In celluloid terms, the film's combination of below-the-belt humour, frolicsome farce and unexpected emotional potency perhaps recalls prime Almodóvar, while even Rivette might envy the long-form control of the shifting plates of its narrative. That said, perhaps the most appropriate epithet lies elsewhere, for in its proudly confident layering of the high-falutin' and the low-slung, its insistence that the portals of vulgarity offer the truest perspective on the human condition, it can really only be called Shakespearean. It's a description that precious few films of the past decade might warrant, but one that Love Exposure deserves. Triumphantly." (http://old.bfi.org.uk/sightandsound/review/5175)