Blah blah, nu orice film poate fi considerat Arta (with capital A). La fel cum nu orice zgomot poate fi muzica, nu orice bucata de marmura - Pieta, etc, etc. Analog, cum exista cineasti de duminica, asa exista si pictori de duminica, scriitori de mana a 7-a, si iarasi etc, etc. (Si da, absolut oricine cu un aparat foto/pix/pensula/dalta/etc/etc in mana este un artist genuin, aflat in travaliul creatiei. Daca a mai rasfoit si 2-3 carti/reviste de fotografie/cinema reteta e mai mult ca sigura. Yeah, right...). Tot blah blah-ul asta si in cazul audientei. Clar, creatorii (de orice natura, se extrapoleaza usor in diferite medii) si publicul aferent se merita reciproc. Simbioza e perfecta. Drumuri batute de mii de ori.
Referitor la audienta, mi-am adus aminte ce spunea peronajul Isaac Davis in
Manhattan:
- This is so antiseptic. It's empty.[...] You're going by audience reaction? This is an audience that's raised on television, their standards have been systematically lowered over the years. These guys sit in front of their sets and the gamma rays eat the white cells of their brains out!
Originally Posted by Mercutio:
|
exact, in arta ,precum si in alte domenii umane, nu exista progres.
|
. Sincer, sper sa fie o greaseala de dactilografiere!