Originally Posted by Federico:
...Faza cu "la doua minute" e o exagerare obraznica, stii bine.  .. |
oeuf course
, pentru a sublinia ideea.
cat despre intrebarile tale, imi pare rau, dar imi scapa sensul unor fraze ca acestea:
Originally Posted by Federico:
|
... filmul chiar despre asta este: despre natura Filmului...
|
sau
Originally Posted by Federico:
|
The film is asking us, “What is the character of this character?” .... which the Driver responds to by saying, “Scary,” nodding to its classical function;
|
autorul articolului s-a etichetat de la bun inceput cu o afirmatie care m-a pus in garda:
"Some critics and audiences have accused Drive of being shallow, existential noir posturing.
This is a reading displaying a viewer’s own shallow interpretation of material that is, I believe, ample in breadth as it is intimately controlled by the director's reigns."
ceea ce face el e o greseala pe care doar criticii amatori o fac. intra pe un teren foarte alunecos, cel al interpretarii. aici, nene, poti s-o tii asa la nesfarsit. problema e ca putini te iau in serios.
as vrea sa aflu cateva argumente privind regia, ce criterii au avut cei de la cannes, de exemplu, nu speculatii.