Originally Posted by Supastar:
|
n-am citit cartile, dar aluzia/critica la adresa religiei este ATAT de evidenta, incat aproape k am strambat din nas din cauza transparentei. exemplele din film sunt numeroase (imi vin in cap 4-5 doar pe moment.)
|
Da, o persoana atenta poate observa aluzii la religie in film. Insa nu exista referinte
explicite, pe cand religia era o tema majora a cartii.
Quote:
|
de asemenea se mentioneaza de cateva ori faptul k demonii reprezinta sufletele persoanelor si k exista o relatie speciala atat la nivel psihic, cat si fizic.
|
Se mentioneaza intr-adevar si probabil m-am exprimat gresit inainte. Ceea ce nu reuseste filmul sa redea e profunzimea aceste legaturi. Daca ai vazut doar filmul, poti sa imi spui ce personalitate are Pan? Cu siguranta nu, pentru ca producatorii au fost mult mai preocupati de renderizarea lui decat de ceea ce gandeste. Uite, dau un fragment din carte, ca sa vezi ce inseamna comunicarea intre Lyra si Pan:
"Pan, do you really think it's not poison in that wine?"
"No," he said. "I think it is, like you do. And I think it's none of our business. And I think it would be the silliest thing you've ever done in a lifetime of silly things to interfere. It's nothing to do with us."
"Don't be stupid," Lyra said. "I can't sit in here and watch them give him poison!"
"Come somewhere else, then."
"You're a coward, Pan."
"Certainly I am. May I ask what you intend to do? Are you going to leap out and snatch the glass from his trembling fingers? What did you have in mind?"
"I didn't have anything in mind, and well you know it," she snapped quietly. "But now I've seen what the Master did, I haven't got any choice. You're supposed to know about conscience, aren't you? How can I just go and sit in the library or somewhere and twiddle my thumbs, knowing what's going to happen? I don't intend to do that, I promise you."
"This is what you wanted all the time," he said after a moment. "You wanted to hide in here and watch. Why didn't I realize that before?"
"All right, I do," she said. "Everyone knows they get up to something secret. They have a ritual or something. And I just wanted to know what it was."
"It's none of your business! If they want to enjoy their little secrets you should just feel superior and let them get on with it. Hiding and spying is for silly children."
"Exactly what I knew you'd say. Now stop nagging."
The two of them sat in silence for a while, Lyra uncomfortable on the hard floor of the wardrobe and Pantalaimon self-righteously twitching his temporary antennae on one of the robes."
Quote:
|
inteleg k vrei s spui k sunt mai misto cartile (pe care nu le-am citit, dar e foarte probabil sa fie asa), dar asta nu inseamna k nu tre s fi drept&cumpatat cu filmul (care e si el bun!).
|
Filmul are actori excelenti, efecte speciale bune si actiune vag distractiva (pentru mine, poate pentru altii e mai palpitanta). Asta e exact ce am spus si inainte. Dar asta nu inseamna ca filmul e bun. Nu are mesaj (sau mai degraba are unul foarte generic), iar personajele nu sunt suficient conturate si nu creeaza o conexiune emotionala puternica cu spectatorii. Cand ai o sursa atat de interesanta precum cartea si o distrugi ca sa te apropii cat mai mult de formula clasica hollywoodiana, atunci e clar ca esuezi.
Sigur, daca il compari cu majoritatea filmelor americane atunci se poate spune ca e mai bun. Pe de alta parte insa il poti compara cu Bridge to Terabithia care a redus la minimum efectele speciale, dar a stiut sa pastreze in buna masura spiritul cartii (de data asta pro-religie), inclusiv cu partile care riscau sa provoaca controverse. Rezultatul: Bridge to Terabithia cu un buget de vreo zece ori mai mic, a avut incasari mai mari in primul weekend. Poate boss-ii studiourilor invata ceva din lectia asta, desi ma indoiesc.