Originally Posted by razvan-gabriel:
|
(...) incerc si acum sa-mi dau seama ce naiba il fascina atat de mult fermierul ala, ce poveste sau caracter special avea el?
|
Päi sugestia cä fi-su-i fi-su...
Originally Posted by razvan-gabriel:
|
(...) un final infiorator. De fapt aici am fost surprins, nu mi s-a parut deloc previzibil finalul, nu ma asteptam sa fie atat de sec si de prost.
|
Previzibilä era faza cä Dan va câstiga respectul lui Wade, care într-un fel sau altul va "coopera" cu el. Dar, asa cum zici, dincolo de asta, apar tot felul de tâmpenii - în frunte cu dezväluirea privitoare la plod, si momentul când Wade îsi împuscä toti membrii bandei care veneau sä-l salveze. Bagä un ochi pe IMDB, pânä si americanii am rämas socati de idiotenia asta.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0381849/synopsis
At the very moment that the protagonist Dan Evans is putting Ben Wade onto the prison train, Wade's gang shoots the rancher-with-low-self-esteem to death. In a move that makes no sense, Ben Wade grabs a gun and murders every man of his gang, which has just rescued him. Then Ben Wade boards the prison train. Presumably, the rancher's rebellious young son gets to collect the $1,000 payment for putting Wade on the train, but it's unclear. The audience is left stunned.