paul_aramis |
01 Nov 2009 14:58 |
Of course, this is about "The Spitting theory". As everybody knows, there must have been a second spitter.
Unfortunately the immutable laws of physics contradict the whole premise of your account. Allow me to reconstruct this if I may for Miss Benes as I've heard this story a number of times.
j...: N..., K..., if you'll indulge me. According to your story K... passes you and starts walking up the ramp then you say you were struck on the right temple. The spit then proceeds to ricochet off the temple striking Newman between the third and forth rib. The spit then cam off the rib turned and hit Newman in the right wrist causing him to drop his baseball cap. The spit then splashed off the wrist, Pauses In mid air mind you- makes a left turn and lands on N...'s left thigh. That is one magic luggie…
N...: Well that's the way it happened.
J...: What happened to your head when you got hit?
K...: Well. Uh, well my head went back and to the left
J...: Again
K...: Back and to the left
J...: Back and to the left Back and to the left
E...: So, what are you saying?
J...: I am saying that the spit could not have come from behind ... that there had to have been a second spitter behind the bushes on the gravelly road. If the spitter was behind you as you claimed that would have caused your head to pitch forward.
E...: So the spit could have only come from the front and to the right.
J...: But that is not what they would have you believe.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYkrjjTkjdk
Parodie la secvenţa asasinării lui JFK.
|