Originally Posted by Twinsen:
Da, da, sunt dezinformat si incult. Si nu inteleg nimic. Pacat ca cei de la Criterion il numesc aici "a Hollywood classic", probabil si ei sunt dezinformati si nu inteleg nimic. |
o nuanta pe care nu cred c-o vei sesiza.
a fost realizat ca film independent. adica autorul a avut posibilitatea sa se exprime liber, fara impuneri din partea unui studio. faptul ca a fost preluat mai tarziu de o casa de distrubutie hollywoodiana e altceva. ma'ndoiesc ca vei intelege, atata timp cat, logic, matematic, pentru tine Hollywood e o constanta.
citeste pana la capat cand citesti ceva:
"Without anyone’s necessarily realizing it at the time, 12 Angry Men was among the first films to signal a shift away from the influence and sensibility of the Hollywood studio system. The movie was shot in New York and, with the exception of its star, Henry Fonda, was cast with actors, the eleven other jurors—an all-star roster of character actors, including E. G. Marshall, Ed Begley, Lee J. Cobb, Jack Klugman, and Jack Warden—known, if at all, for their New York stage and television work. This was typical of the so-called New York School of filmmaking—with its focus on social issues, urban settings, and moral decay—which came to define an era of social consciousness and realism in cinema, stretching from On the Waterfront (1954) to Midnight Cowboy (1969) and into the 1970s."
http://www.criterion.com/current/pos...-lumet-s-faces