cred ca in paragraful de mai jos e reprezentativ pentru constructia lui Pitbull despre Passions:
Originally Posted by Pitbull:
|
One simple example: Jesus covered in blood after being whipped.
Yes, THIS is how he should have looked. But, ON SCREEN, it looks false. The camera does NOT see reality as it is, it's always adding a new dimension - and this dimension can sometimes instill an apparent falseness to an otherwise faithful reality. In truth, a man such tortured DOES look like a skinned pig - but NEVER as a Messiah! He's REPULSIVE, not faith inspiring. And, in a movie, he doesn't even look real anymore - he looks forced and aesthetically hysteric.
|
independent de cinematografie, cate nici nu a mai contat pentru mine dat fiind subiectul (gresit abordat la nivel conceptual in opinia mea), as spune ca passions e un film ratat deoarece:
daca paradigma mesianica o exemplifici prin suferinta fizica (adica in dimensiune umana!)... pai atunci is cel putin alte mii de cazuri mai bune, mai utile unei astfel de abordari!
apoi, if u wanna f.uck the christian dogmatism - well, atunci discuti povestea intr-un teren religios unde opui figura christica demersurilor religioase institutionale si institutionalizate...