Originally Posted by Gaandalf:
|
tu doar gresheala asta ai sesizat-o ?
|
nu. dar aia mi s-a parut singura demna sa "go in the books" si sa fie tinuta minte si dupa un an.
sunt curios pe cine ii pune sa comenteze , anul asta. poate ii da o sansa si lu neti sandu si ne ia aia cu astrele. :sick:
in alta ordine de idei, uitati aici o faza dusa rau de tot :
Later this month, when Clint Eastwood faces off against Martin Scorsese in the battle for the Academy Award for best director, they could be fighting over much more than a gold statue. Life itself could be at stake. A study by a University of Toronto physician suggests that winning an Oscar can extend a director's life-span dramatically.
In fact, Oscar-winning directors live about two years longer than those who were just nominated, the result of a 24% decrease in the risk of death over their lifetimes. Those with multiple wins saw their average risk of death decrease 48% compared to those with only one statuette.
...
In fact, statistically speaking, Oscar-winning writers actually die on average 3.6 years sooner their peers who are just nominated. Redelmeier offers two possible explanations. First, professional prestige has less of a direct impact on screenwriter's careers than it does on actors and directors. After all, screenplays are read anonymously and who remembers who actually wrote Driving Miss Daisy? Another possible factor? Unhealthy lifestyles. Award-winning actors and directors wind up with entourages of personal trainers and nutritionists who make sure they take care of themselves. Writers don't. Indeed, the financial security brought on by winning an Oscar may even allow them to indulge more deeply in their unhealthy habits
http://www.forbes.com/healthcare/200...sdirector.html