![]() |
Intrebare Django Unchained
Disclaimer: Va rog daca se poate sa ma luminati putin, aceasta nu este sustinerea unei pareri ci o intrebare.
Deci Orscar 2013 best supporting actor... Nu este rolul lui Christoph Waltz undeva la limita intre support si lead? Spoiler!!! Ok, moare personajul Schultz prin jumatatea a doua dar si asa are mai multe linii de dialog decat Django. |
da, e la limita si nominalizarea a fost controversata, din cate am auzit.
|
Incerc sa gasesc pe net ce spui dar nu reusesc. Gasesc ca fost controversat, da, dar nu din punctul asta de vedere.
|
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/rac...-ballot-422546
BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR “I rule out Christoph Waltz because this is a fake nomination — he’s a co-lead with Jamie Foxx, and it’s unfair for the others to compete with that. Also, much of his performance is just like in Inglourious Basterds. Robert De Niro was just Robert De Niro; yes, he had one crying scene, but crying is not enough. Alan Arkin in Argo? I’m shocked he’s even nominated. Tommy Lee Jones has been such a bitter guy -- all that scowling at the Golden Globes? I’m telling you, people don’t like the guy. So I turn to Philip Seymour Hoffman, who was sublime in The Master. It’s a very original performance. What’s interesting about it is you don’t know where the character is coming from; you sort of assume he’s insincere, but sometimes he comes across as extremely sincere. Now, you could argue that it’s also a lead, but if you go back and take out a stopwatch, you’ll realize that it really is Joaquin Phoenix’s movie.” Vote: Philip Seymour Hoffman (The Master) e un interviu cu unul dintre votanti |
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 22:49. |
Powered by vBulletin - Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.