Cinemagia Forum - Aici puteti intreba orice va trazneste(nu despre film)

Cinemagia Forum (https://www.cinemagia.ro/forum/index.php)

- Vreau sa stiu (https://www.cinemagia.ro/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=225)

- - Aici puteti intreba orice va trazneste(nu despre film) (https://www.cinemagia.ro/forum/showthread.php?t=94958)

Dar e vreo problema daca am laptop'ul asta de un an si 6 luni si n'am bagat niciodata bateria in el?:-?

Aha, multumesc anaemona. Si Kuhaylan. :)

Acum legat de intrebarea a doua copiasem incomplet citatul. (De-aia n-a raspuns nimeni) Am editat si pe pagina trecuta dar il reiau aici:

Quote:

You have also written that poetry represents "the mysteries of the irrational perceived
through rational words. " But many feel that the "irrational" has little place in an age
when the exact knowledge of science has begun to plumb the most profound mysteries of
existence. Do you agree?
This appearance is very deceptive. It is a journalistic illusion. In point of fact, the greater
one's science, the deeper the sense of mystery. Moreover, I don't believe that any science today
has pierced any mystery. We, as newspaper readers, are inclined to call "science" the cleverness of an electrician or a psychiatrist's mumbo jumbo. This, at best, is applied science, and one of the characteristics of applied science is that yesterday's neutron or today's truth dies tomorrow. But even in a better sense of "science"-- as the study of visible and palpable nature, or the poetry of pure mathematics and pure philosophy-- the situation remains as hopeless as ever. We shall never know the origin of life, or the meaning of life, or the nature of space and time, or the nature of nature, or the nature of thought.
Man's understanding of these mysteries is embodied in his concept of a Divine Being. As
a final question, do you believe in God?
To be quite candid-- and what I am going to say now is something I never said before, and I
hope it provokes a salutary little chill-- I know more than I can express in words, and the little I
can express would not have been expressed, had I not known more.

Vreau sa stiu daca e afirmativ sau negativ ambiguul raspuns final al intervievatului.

Originally Posted by Federico:

Aha, multumesc anaemona. Si Kuhaylan. :)

Acum legat de intrebarea a doua copiasem incomplet citatul. (De-aia n-a raspuns nimeni) Am editat si pe pagina trecuta dar il reiau aici:

Quote:

Vreau sa stiu daca e afirmativ sau negativ ambiguul raspuns final al intervievatului.

ceea ce e cu rosu ar trebui sa iti raspunda la intrebare... faptul ca persoana respectiva nu poate exprima in cuvinte ceea ce simte, e clar un raspuns afirmativ pentru ca in opinia lui, existenta lui Dumnezeu nu poate fi explicata prin cuvinte ci doar simtita:D

Ok, mersi, Kuhaylan!:)

Originally Posted by dragonfly_drk:

e clar

ba nu e clar deloc.

am explicat de ce e clar. citeste printre randuri, in substrat... nu lua cuvintele asa cum sunt puse acolo si gata. incearca sa te pui in mintea autorului si sa iti dai seama ce a vrut sa spuna.

desi, daca stau mai bine sa ma gandesc, cred ca depinde foarte mult si in ce credem noi, cei care citim. un ateu, probabil va spune ca autorul nu crede in Dumnezeu, e cand un om care crede, va spune contrariul... aici e vorba de subiectivism... iar cel/cea care a dat raspunsul ala, a fost foarte smecher/a prin prisma faptului ca a lasat la latitudinea celui care citeste sa decida pentru el/ea...

mai pe scurt, s-a scos! :))

Mie nu mi se pare ca e un da : "Stiu mai mult decat pot exprima in cuvinte, si putinul pe care il pot spune nu ar fi fost exprimat daca nu as fi stiut mai mult" Unde e afirmatia aici?! E ambiguu. Cel mult poti spune ca nu e ateu, ci agnostic. Eu nu inteleg deloc ca el crede in Dumnezeu.